<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumours of xml:id trouble in the W3C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/02/11/rumours-of-xmlid-trouble-in-the-w3c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/02/11/rumours-of-xmlid-trouble-in-the-w3c/</link>
	<description>Open information and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Walsh</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/02/11/rumours-of-xmlid-trouble-in-the-w3c/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=16#comment-55</guid>
		<description>No one, as far as I know, has decided to do anything. Yet. A problem has been identified, a workaround (I just can&#039;t bring myself to call it a solution) has been suggested, and discussion continues to percolate through the consortium and the community. Happily, all of the places where technical discussion will take place (www-tag, public-xml-core-wg, and public-xml-id) are public lists so there should be no need for conspiracy theories. Except of course that mentioning probably creates them :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one, as far as I know, has decided to do anything. Yet. A problem has been identified, a workaround (I just can&#8217;t bring myself to call it a solution) has been suggested, and discussion continues to percolate through the consortium and the community. Happily, all of the places where technical discussion will take place (www-tag, public-xml-core-wg, and public-xml-id) are public lists so there should be no need for conspiracy theories. Except of course that mentioning probably creates them <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
