<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burden of Proof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/05/16/burden-of-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/05/16/burden-of-proof/</link>
	<description>Open information and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unnecessary Until Proven Required [@lesscode.org]</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/05/16/burden-of-proof/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unnecessary Until Proven Required [@lesscode.org]]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/?p=45#comment-168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] But David Meggison does an excellent job in describing why the simplicity argument is a healthy way of thinking of about systems anyway: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But David Meggison does an excellent job in describing why the simplicity argument is a healthy way of thinking of about systems anyway: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/05/16/burden-of-proof/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Cowan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/?p=45#comment-167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the &quot;It won&#039;t scale&quot; dis is still very much with us.  I like to satirize it by saying &quot;But will it scale to a BILLION HITS PER SECOND from each of a TRILLION CUSTOMERS???&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8220;It won&#8217;t scale&#8221; dis is still very much with us.  I like to satirize it by saying &#8220;But will it scale to a BILLION HITS PER SECOND from each of a TRILLION CUSTOMERS???&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

