<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The case against easier feed subscriptions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/06/13/the-case-against-easier-feed-subscriptions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/06/13/the-case-against-easier-feed-subscriptions/</link>
	<description>Open information and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alpha Gecko &#187; Quoderat: The case against easier feed subscriptions</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/06/13/the-case-against-easier-feed-subscriptions/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alpha Gecko &#187; Quoderat: The case against easier feed subscriptions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 01:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/?p=52#comment-235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] David Megginson posted today about The case against easier feed subscriptions, noting that if it&#8217;s too easy to subscribe to a feed, it will also be too easy to sneak a subscription into someone&#8217;s feed reader and use it for illegitimate purposes. The response I posted was as follows: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Megginson posted today about The case against easier feed subscriptions, noting that if it&#8217;s too easy to subscribe to a feed, it will also be too easy to sneak a subscription into someone&#8217;s feed reader and use it for illegitimate purposes. The response I posted was as follows: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antone Roundy</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2005/06/13/the-case-against-easier-feed-subscriptions/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antone Roundy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/?p=52#comment-234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point! The approach I&#039;d favor  would be to make it easy to view a feed, but require another click to subscribe to it. It&#039;s a little odd to me that feed readers require you to subscribe to a feed in order to view it. Subscribing to a feed is like bookmarking a webpage. While your web browser may keep a temporary history of every page you&#039;ve viewed, it doesn&#039;t bookmark all of them automatically. Feed readers should offer this same mode of operation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point! The approach I&#8217;d favor  would be to make it easy to view a feed, but require another click to subscribe to it. It&#8217;s a little odd to me that feed readers require you to subscribe to a feed in order to view it. Subscribing to a feed is like bookmarking a webpage. While your web browser may keep a temporary history of every page you&#8217;ve viewed, it doesn&#8217;t bookmark all of them automatically. Feed readers should offer this same mode of operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

