<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RFC: (Java) SAX exceptions and new minor SAX version</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quoderat.megginson.com/2006/03/12/rfc-java-sax-exceptions-and-new-minor-sax-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2006/03/12/rfc-java-sax-exceptions-and-new-minor-sax-version/</link>
	<description>Open information and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Beyer</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2006/03/12/rfc-java-sax-exceptions-and-new-minor-sax-version/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan Beyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/archives/2006/03/12/rfc-java-sax-exceptions-and-new-minor-sax-version/#comment-438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2006/03/12/rfc-java-sax-exceptions-and-new-minor-sax-version/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/archives/2006/03/12/rfc-java-sax-exceptions-and-new-minor-sax-version/#comment-437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strong yes. As another poster I would have favoured the SAXException constructor to call #initCause but as mentioned some !@#!@# decided that calling #initCause twice is forbidden.

ServletException should do the same thing. I hate it when cause chains break at ServletException.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strong yes. As another poster I would have favoured the SAXException constructor to call #initCause but as mentioned some !@#!@# decided that calling #initCause twice is forbidden.</p>
<p>ServletException should do the same thing. I hate it when cause chains break at ServletException.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

