<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSIE MIA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/01/24/msie-mia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/01/24/msie-mia/</link>
	<description>Open information and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nottingham</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/01/24/msie-mia/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Nottingham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2007/01/24/msie-mia/#comment-634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting that NetNewsWire (an RSS aggregator) is in there. Perhaps you&#039;re seeing Firefox&#039;s numbers inflated because its built-in aggregator is polling your feed? Just a thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that NetNewsWire (an RSS aggregator) is in there. Perhaps you&#8217;re seeing Firefox&#8217;s numbers inflated because its built-in aggregator is polling your feed? Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony B. Coates</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/01/24/msie-mia/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony B. Coates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2007/01/24/msie-mia/#comment-633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve checked the FeedBurner stats for my blog for the last 3 days, and those do distinguish IE 6 &amp; 7.  My blog is mostly hit by searches from Google, mostly for Linux-related items.  My stats are
Firefox 2.0.0.1: 35%
IE 6.0: 18%
Firefox 1.5.0.9: 13%
IE 7.0: 11%
Firefox 2.0: 7%
Mozilla 5.0: 6%
Other: 11%
That&#039;s 61% for Firefox+Mozilla, 29% for IE.  IE 6 still has almost twice as much usage as IE7 according to my stats.  As far as operating systems go, to the nearest 1/2 percent it&#039;s
Windows XP: 48.5%
Linux: 41.5%
Windows 2000: 3.5%
Mac OS X (PowerPC): 1.5%
Mac OS X (Intel): 1.5%
Windows 2003: 1.5%
Windows Vista: 1%
Other: 1%
so it&#039;s Windows 54.5%, Linux 41.5%, Mac 3%.
Cheers, Tony.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve checked the FeedBurner stats for my blog for the last 3 days, and those do distinguish IE 6 &amp; 7.  My blog is mostly hit by searches from Google, mostly for Linux-related items.  My stats are<br />
Firefox 2.0.0.1: 35%<br />
IE 6.0: 18%<br />
Firefox 1.5.0.9: 13%<br />
IE 7.0: 11%<br />
Firefox 2.0: 7%<br />
Mozilla 5.0: 6%<br />
Other: 11%<br />
That&#8217;s 61% for Firefox+Mozilla, 29% for IE.  IE 6 still has almost twice as much usage as IE7 according to my stats.  As far as operating systems go, to the nearest 1/2 percent it&#8217;s<br />
Windows XP: 48.5%<br />
Linux: 41.5%<br />
Windows 2000: 3.5%<br />
Mac OS X (PowerPC): 1.5%<br />
Mac OS X (Intel): 1.5%<br />
Windows 2003: 1.5%<br />
Windows Vista: 1%<br />
Other: 1%<br />
so it&#8217;s Windows 54.5%, Linux 41.5%, Mac 3%.<br />
Cheers, Tony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Carver</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/01/24/msie-mia/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Carver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2007/01/24/msie-mia/#comment-632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave, I&#039;ve seen similar stats since IE 7 was released, and know many people that were die hard IE 6 users that have made to switch to FireFox after having used IE 7.   Our own stats are around 65% IE, 33% Firefox, with over 87% of vistors using a Windows OS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I&#8217;ve seen similar stats since IE 7 was released, and know many people that were die hard IE 6 users that have made to switch to FireFox after having used IE 7.   Our own stats are around 65% IE, 33% Firefox, with over 87% of vistors using a Windows OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/01/24/msie-mia/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2007/01/24/msie-mia/#comment-631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re seeing about three times the normal percentage of Mac users and probably ten times the normal percentage of Linux users. I wish the rest of the web had stats like that, but, alas, no. At work (a large shopping website), Firefox is still down around 10% or so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re seeing about three times the normal percentage of Mac users and probably ten times the normal percentage of Linux users. I wish the rest of the web had stats like that, but, alas, no. At work (a large shopping website), Firefox is still down around 10% or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/01/24/msie-mia/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Cowan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2007/01/24/msie-mia/#comment-630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If a quarter of your visitors are non-Windows, that is a high percentage indeed (about 95% of desktops run Windows, by the best current guesses).  It&#039;s hardly surprising that MSIE is low.  And I don&#039;t believe it&#039;s IE7 being classified as unknown, or you&#039;d see a big spike in Unknown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a quarter of your visitors are non-Windows, that is a high percentage indeed (about 95% of desktops run Windows, by the best current guesses).  It&#8217;s hardly surprising that MSIE is low.  And I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s IE7 being classified as unknown, or you&#8217;d see a big spike in Unknown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

