http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/11/05/first-looks-at-opensocial-part-2-content-for-members-and-friends/ Open information and technology. Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:40:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/11/05/first-looks-at-opensocial-part-2-content-for-members-and-friends/#comment-721 Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:27:57 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2007/11/05/first-looks-at-opensocial-part-2-content-for-members-and-friends/#comment-721 [...] Quoderat « First looks at OpenSocial: part 2 (content for members and friends) [...]

]]> http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/11/05/first-looks-at-opensocial-part-2-content-for-members-and-friends/#comment-720 Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:09:10 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2007/11/05/first-looks-at-opensocial-part-2-content-for-members-and-friends/#comment-720 Absolutely right, David — thanks. I missed that in my scan.

]]> http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/11/05/first-looks-at-opensocial-part-2-content-for-members-and-friends/#comment-719 Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:01:27 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2007/11/05/first-looks-at-opensocial-part-2-content-for-members-and-friends/#comment-719 It looks to me like the gml namespace is declared where it’s used, on the gml:Point elements (which wrap the gml:post elements), so I can’t see any problems with it. Am I missing something?

]]> http://quoderat.megginson.com/2007/11/05/first-looks-at-opensocial-part-2-content-for-members-and-friends/#comment-718 Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:56:42 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2007/11/05/first-looks-at-opensocial-part-2-content-for-members-and-friends/#comment-718 Considering the fanfare, it’s looking a bit sloppy David? I’d have thought they’d have had
the expertise to get the namespaces right at least.

]]>