Comments on: Customer Problem Checklist https://quoderat.megginson.com/2009/02/27/customer-problem-checklist/ Open information and technology. Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:57:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Robert Brewer https://quoderat.megginson.com/2009/02/27/customer-problem-checklist/#comment-2152 Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:42:52 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/?p=241#comment-2152 That’s also a great checklist for “What makes a good bug ticket”.

]]>
By: david https://quoderat.megginson.com/2009/02/27/customer-problem-checklist/#comment-2151 Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:20:50 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/?p=241#comment-2151 Thanks for the comments, Dave.

#2: Sorry for any confusion — I’m talking about the customer’s business need, not mine. Companies don’t buy software, for example, because RSS, Atom, or Semantic Networks are cool; they buy software because they want to do something with it. What they want/need to do — not how they’ll do it — is the business need.

#4: Counting is part of the analysis, but the problem itself has to be quantifiable so that that analysis can later take place. There has to be something there that you and the customer can count, or else it’s all fuzzy, hand-waving stuff.

#5: I think there might be more confusion here — for me, the customer is the one who we expect to fund the project or buy the product. It might be an internal customer (say, the division in your company from whose budget the funding will come), or it might be an external customer. If the customer’s problem isn’t compelling, why would they bother spending money on your project or product?

#6: Yes, I think “summarize” is a good change, and I’ll edit the posting accordingly.

]]>
By: Dave Pawson https://quoderat.megginson.com/2009/02/27/customer-problem-checklist/#comment-2150 Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:08:25 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/?p=241#comment-2150 2. I’m suspicious. Customers don’t give a sh.. about business needs? Why should they?
4. Counting is part of the analysis surely? Not the problem definition?
5. Not IMHO. It may be, from the organisational perspective. It may actually
cost the business to solve this one. Still good from the customer perspective?
6. I’d prefer ‘summarize’ to describe. This to retain 1, which is key.

regards DaveP

]]>