Comments on: Amazon EC2 “micro instances” vs. Google App Engine https://quoderat.megginson.com/2010/09/09/amazon-ec2-micro-instances-vs-google-app-engine/ Open information and technology. Thu, 26 Dec 2013 19:51:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: top ten web hosting in us https://quoderat.megginson.com/2010/09/09/amazon-ec2-micro-instances-vs-google-app-engine/#comment-5132 Thu, 26 Dec 2013 19:51:15 +0000 http://quoderat.megginson.com/?p=393#comment-5132 Every weekend i used to pay a quick visit this website,
because i want enjoyment, for the reason that this this web page conations
really good funny information too.

]]>
By: Amazon EC2 Micro Instance Roundup « Knowledge Networks https://quoderat.megginson.com/2010/09/09/amazon-ec2-micro-instances-vs-google-app-engine/#comment-3963 Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:10:53 +0000 http://quoderat.megginson.com/?p=393#comment-3963 […] “Amazon EC2 “micro instances” vs. Google App Engine“: EC micro not necessarily cheaper than GAE, especially when considering additional costs for EBS storage. […]

]]>
By: Janess https://quoderat.megginson.com/2010/09/09/amazon-ec2-micro-instances-vs-google-app-engine/#comment-3917 Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:46:15 +0000 http://quoderat.megginson.com/?p=393#comment-3917 In reply to Akshay Arabolu.

Too many copmlmintes too little space, thanks!

]]>
By: Akshay Arabolu https://quoderat.megginson.com/2010/09/09/amazon-ec2-micro-instances-vs-google-app-engine/#comment-3804 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:54:35 +0000 http://quoderat.megginson.com/?p=393#comment-3804 Hi David,

Just came across this comparison of yours between Amazon EC2 vs Google App Engine. Great article. Wanted to know if you’d like to feature it on getcomparisons.com? A project we’ve started to house all the best product comparisons on the web under one roof. You can back-link to this original article of course. Check it out, and if you’re interested, I will send you an invite.

Cheers,
Akshay Arabolu, Founder

]]>
By: Nick Johnson https://quoderat.megginson.com/2010/09/09/amazon-ec2-micro-instances-vs-google-app-engine/#comment-3455 Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:57:48 +0000 http://quoderat.megginson.com/?p=393#comment-3455 My take (admittedly I’m biased, since I’m on the App Engine team):

I suspect that for many users, the ability to just drop in an app without having to spend weeks messing around with JVM-limited language ports[…]

One of App Engine’s major advantage is that you don’t have to spend weeks messing around with server configuration, replication, failover, backups, monitoring, and so forth – it’s much more drop-in than a bare server offering can be.

I think, though, that most of the advantages of the new micro instances will be complementary to App Engine, not in competition. Two things spring immediately to mind:
1. Micro instances provide a perfect hosting platform for TyphoonAE, an independent implementation of the App Engine platform. Users wanting to move low traffic apps off App Engine can set up a micro instance running TyphoonAE, and avoid having to modify their code.
2. Micro instances also provide a perfect platform for doing ‘offline work’ for App Engine apps at relatively low volumes. Suppose, for example, that your app generally fits well on App Engine, but you have a few things, such as image recognition or processing, or video transcoding, that require facilities not available on App Engine. A micro instance may be exactly what you need in the way of minimal, low-cost server resources to perform this batch work.

]]>
By: Moved Site to Amazon Cloud Micro Instance | Sean Esopenko https://quoderat.megginson.com/2010/09/09/amazon-ec2-micro-instances-vs-google-app-engine/#comment-3453 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:45:05 +0000 http://quoderat.megginson.com/?p=393#comment-3453 […] found a pretty good comparison of Amazon EC2 micro Vs. Google Apps at Quoderat.  I have some experience utilizing Amazon EC2 so it wasn’t difficult to jump in.  For […]

]]>
By: davidmegginson https://quoderat.megginson.com/2010/09/09/amazon-ec2-micro-instances-vs-google-app-engine/#comment-3452 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:02:59 +0000 http://quoderat.megginson.com/?p=393#comment-3452 Great point, John. 1 GB would probably be more database storage than most small apps need, but I’m not sure about traffic.

]]>
By: John Cowan https://quoderat.megginson.com/2010/09/09/amazon-ec2-micro-instances-vs-google-app-engine/#comment-3451 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:56:19 +0000 http://quoderat.megginson.com/?p=393#comment-3451 You also need to factor in the US$0.10 per GiB per month and the US$0.10 per million I/O operations for Elastic Block Storage (replicated raw hard disks) if you want a drop-in replacement. Amazon says a “medium-sized web database” with 100 GiB would probably cost another US$36 per month in EBS charges, so that’s $50/month, plus S3 charges for backup (you can back up EBS disks to S3 in compressed form). Still cheap and scalable, but not quite as cheap as it sounded before.

]]>